FDIC Proposes Stricter Corporate Governance Standards for Large Banks
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has recently proposed new standards for corporate governance and risk management for large banks with $10 billion or more in total assets. These standards, known as the Proposed Standards, aim to establish more extensive and rigid requirements for state-chartered banks and mark a departure from the previous reliance on state law for governance and oversight obligations.
The Shift from Principles-based to Rules-based Corporate Governance
The Proposed Standards represent a shift from a principles-based approach to a more rules-based approach for corporate governance. While the principles-based approach allows for flexibility and tailoring to individual banks, the new rules-based approach seeks to establish uniform regulatory mandates. However, critics argue that what may be considered “good” corporate governance for one bank may not necessarily be suitable for another.
It is important to note that achieving effective corporate governance requires a combination of default rules that can be tailored and fiduciary duties that can be fit. The Proposed Standards seemingly overlook this nuanced approach by imposing one-size-fits-all regulations.
Background on Governance and Risk Management at State-Chartered Banks
State-chartered banks have historically relied on state law to establish governance and oversight obligations. This approach recognizes the varying needs and characteristics of individual banks, allowing for flexibility and customization. By proposing stricter corporate governance standards, the FDIC aims to align these standards with those imposed on national banks by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Key Features of the Proposed Standards
The Proposed Standards put forth by the FDIC include several key features aimed at enhancing corporate governance and risk management. These features include:
1. Enhanced Board of Directors Responsibilities: The Proposed Standards would impose greater accountability on board members, requiring them to have a deeper understanding of the bank’s risk profile and the ability to effectively oversee risk management practices.
2. Risk Management and Internal Controls: Banks would be required to establish comprehensive risk management and internal control systems to identify, manage, and mitigate risk. This would involve regular assessments and evaluations of the effectiveness of these systems.
3. Management of Third-Party Relationships: The Proposed Standards emphasize the need for banks to effectively manage and govern relationships with third-party service providers to mitigate risks associated with these partnerships.
4. Information Security and Cybersecurity: Banks would be expected to develop robust information security and cybersecurity programs to protect sensitive customer data and guard against cyber threats.
Implications and Criticisms
While the FDIC’s intention with the Proposed Standards is to strengthen corporate governance and risk management practices, there are several criticisms surrounding these proposals. Critics argue that the rules-based approach may hinder innovation and flexibility, preventing banks from adapting to evolving market conditions and customer demands.
Another concern is the potential burden that the stricter standards may impose on smaller banks, who may struggle to comply with the rigid requirements. This could result in a consolidation of the industry, as smaller banks may find it difficult to compete with larger institutions that have the resources to meet these new standards.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the purpose of the FDIC’s Proposed Standards?
The Proposed Standards aim to establish stricter corporate governance and risk management requirements for large banks with $10 billion or more in total assets.
2. How do the Proposed Standards differ from previous practices?
The Proposed Standards represent a shift from a principles-based approach to a more rules-based approach, which imposes uniform regulatory mandates rather than allowing for flexibility and customization.
3. What are the key features of the Proposed Standards?
The Proposed Standards include enhanced board responsibilities, requirements for comprehensive risk management and internal controls, governance of third-party relationships, and robust information security and cybersecurity programs.
4. What are some criticisms of the Proposed Standards?
Critics argue that the rules-based approach may hinder innovation and flexibility, potentially burden smaller banks, and lead to industry consolidation.
For more information about corporate governance and risk management, visit VisBanking. To learn about pricing options or request a demo, check out VisBanking Pricing and Request a Demo.
